Skip to main content

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks 2022. Week 1/January: Foundations.

 FOUNDATIONS

My initial thought when I saw this week/months theme was wouldn't it be great if I had ancestoral links to the late 60's UK soul band, The Foundations. I couldn't name one of their songs but the name lingered in my memory. But no, there are no links there.

I then thought about foundation stones, many can be found within Methodist Churches, but I cannot think of anyone within my family that could have such a memorial stone, although my Great Grandfather is said to have started a church in London in the 1880s.

But to be honest with you, for this weeks theme I was always going to write about:

PHILIP JAY of Cavendish & Long Melford Suffolk

1780 - 1841

who was involved in the manufacture of foundation garments in the early 1800's.

Philip was a Stay- Manufacturer.

Philip was the eldest son, of those surviving infancy, of Samuel & Mary nee Barnard. He was one of 14 children, although at least 4 of those did not survive to see their first birthday. Philip was baptised on the 3rd of August 1780 at Cavendish, Suffolk, an idyllic village that remains a much photographed classic English village to this day.
Cavendish Green
http://www.foxearth.org.uk/
  
The industies and employment related to Suffolk at this time were Farming, Fishing and Textiles. Broadcloth, had been woven in the area since the 13th/14th century. The local sheep grew a thick short curly fleece, ideal for cloth making. However during the Georgian period the thick felted woollen clothing became less fashionable and the area's manufacturers were looking towards diversifying into silk weaving. Samuel Jay was one of Suffolks woollen manufacturers and when Philip came of age he joined the 'family firm' of cloth manufature.

Philip married Susanna Sparrow in 1802, newspaper announcements of the event indicate that he was a 'Stay Manufacturer'.

A brief History of Stays/Corsets

Stays or Corsets was the name given to for the fully laced bodices worn underclothes from the late 16th- 18th century. All of society wore 'stays', although those worn by peasants were made of leather and never washed. By the early 1800's the heavily boned stays were making way for shorter and lighter boned stays and bust bodices to support the empire line fashions. As the fashions evolved and clothing again necessitated the use of heavily boned, waist sinching undergarments of the Victorian period, so the interchangeable name of stays and corsets for the early undergarments, the name corset became more well known.

From the Victoria and Albert Museum Collection: c.1795-1800

Stays made from cotton twill, lined with linen, bound with linen twill tape and stitched with linen thread.

                         https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O138889/stays-unknown/                         

It was around this time that the production in linen became more expensive whilst the cost of cotton was becoming less expensive. The use of cotton in undergarments was becoming increasingly used from the 1810s.

In 1812, the London Gazette published a dissolved partnership between Samuel Jay and his son on 6th Oct, identified as 'woollen manufacturers. Although it would appear that Philip continued within the textile industry, Samuel died in 1816.

The next business event for Philip occurred in May 1820, with the London Gazette that Philip Jay (Stay Manufacturer) was declared bankrupt. Fortunately this was only a short term event as by July 1820, the bankruptcy had been superceded, which suggests that his creditors allowed a percentage of the debt to be paid.

On the  29th of May 1820, Philip and Susanna's youngest child was born, Charles James Jay, he appears to have been their 11th child.

Philip continued in textile manufacturing. In 1822, there was a case at the Old Bailey, whereby Sarah Johnson, aged 19 and Ann Brown, aged 25, were found guilty of theft by pickpocketing. Accused of stealing a pocketbook and a £1 promissory note from Philip Jay, worsted manufacturer of Cavendish, whilst in London. The accused were sentenced to transportation for 7 years.

In 1823, it appears that Philip's business was once again in the news.

Bury and Norwich Post 4th Jun 1823.


It would appear that in a bid to clear his debts Philip sold many of his home effects

From The Ipswich Journal 5th April 1823.


The textile trade in Suffolk was changing, as previously stated the price of linen was increasing cheaper imports of cotton and silk were being imported from India and the Far East and Suffolk manufacturers and weavers were diversifying into silk cloth production. As early as 1770 silk weavers were moving from London to the Sudbury area, but it was the advent of the 19th century, so this new cloth was becoming more prevelent. Perhaps Philip was unable to keep up with the times and this and this new cloth was when his business started to lose money.

In 1830, the electoral roll shows Philip living in Cavendish but by the 1841 census, Philip, Susanna have moved to Cock & Bell Lane in Long Melford, Suffolk. Philip is living by Independent means.

On 31st December 1841, Philip died and was buried at St Mary's church, Cavendish on 7th Jan 1842. His death announcement appearred in the Suffolk Chronicle on 8th Jan 1842.


Philip Jay's will appears to have been written shortly before his death on the 17th December 1841. It is short, unlike his father's, making his wife the exectrix and beneficiary of his estate and effects. A year after his death, on 6th January 1843, Philip's son, Philip was sworn to Administer his father's estate, his mother having renounced the role of Administrator and Exectrix of her husbands estate.

Perhaps a lastling legacy of Samuel and Philip Jay's textile manufacturing history is the number of drapers and merchants of textiles amongst their descendants.


Comments

  1. Very interesting take o the prompt, but I do wonder what became of the transported pickpockets. Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, but they are common names. I note that they were due to be transported via ship, rather than hulk, but that is as far I persued them. Incidently Ann Brown was the name of my 2x Great Grandmother, who died in 1881.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Week 31. Favourite Name.

EUGENIE MARIA MARY CRETON JAY  The Affair: An 1875 engraving shows a man snooping on his wife as she meets with her lover …   This weeks theme is difficult, it is like picking a favourite child. I rather like my 2x Great Grandmother's middle and chosen name, Rosella, but I have already written about her in a previous post:  52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Mothers Day (mypynthdev.blogspot.com)   Incidently my mother said, if she had known the name before I was born she would have chosen it for me. I'm not sure how I would have felt about that as child/teenager. Another name that has drawn me over the years is Catherine Sophia Lissa Woodley and whilst she had, in my opinion, a lovely name, she has an interesting story of her own to tell, I have already written her story:  Catherine Sophia Lissa Woodley: Sister of Mercy (mypynthdev.blogspot.com) So who have I chosen for this weeks post? Well she does have a nice name, but I have for some reason been drawn to her, since s...

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Week 29. Fashion.

WOMENS HOME INDUSTRIES A Post War Home Workers Story  This post was inspired by a dress.* A family member manages a charity shop (thrift store, op shop) for The Plymouth Drake Foundation and received a donation of a bag of vintage dresses. Amongst these were some by the designer, Emma Hanbury and one that had all the elements of haute couture construction and made of silk. The label inside was:- I was asked to see if I could find any information about Dorothy Law of 10 West Halkin St, Belgrave Square, London, sadly I was unable to pinpoint the lady. However what I did find was a post war band of home workers utilising their needle skills to earn "dollars" for the UK economy. This is the story of Womens Home Industries of no.11 West Halkin Street. In post war Britain, there was a need to rebuild the countries economy, it was seen that there was a wealth of talented women, that could be given practical work that they could undertake at home. Under the instigation of Stella Isaa...

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Week 48. Strength.

  FLORENCE STEWART PERRY nee ANDREWS 1882-1957 Kindly shared by JP If you have read any of my previous posts you will have perhaps noticed, I write a lot about the women in my tree. In the most part this is because many focus on the males in their tree, their occupations, their military service etc, but there are often 'strong' women beside them, caring for their children, managing on what money may or may not be coming in and often undertaking sideline home work which was so badly paid. One of those women was my Great Grandmother Eliza Pitts, but I have already written about her under the theme, 'Loss'. So today I am writing about another lady, the wife of my half Grand-Uncle, Florence Stewart Perry nee Andrews wife of John Arthur Perry. When writing his autobiographical journal, 'By Devious Paths' John A. makes this dedication:-  Dedicated to the constant and faithful companion on my Pilgrimage, 'By Devious Paths MY WIFE. Writing this I am well aware that ...